Part 13 – The Trustee Meetings

​

In line with British Constitutional Law that relate our life’s activities in the priority of the Spirit above the Temporal, we operate our activities primarily in this manner.

​

Of course, this can bring spiritual attack and does, the walking away of our former Minister and Trustee Clive Bate from our operations at Barry was we believe a result of Jezebellic activity that over the years of our ministry – over thirty years this has cost us we have been told five and a half million pounds, and we are called of the Lord to get the return of this, trustees and trustees to be throughout the year being determined that assurances given by Clive Bate be kept to.

​

Trustee meetings in the year were limited due to the reasons given in this report; the move from North Wales to SW Scotland, the massive amount of setting up work with limited staff as well as the pressures being placed on us by our former trustee in Barry.

​

Trustees and trustees to be were constantly informed of developments and whilst we refer you the reader to the prophetic section of this report, it needs to be remembered that the word of the prophets is subject to the prophets hence our wide coverage of the prophetic word to obey.

​

1 Corinthians 14:32 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

32 And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.

​

Each month trustees and trustees to be received a monthly financial report as well as a procedural one knowing as featured in the next part, trustees were being brought together from all over the world to fulfil the given seven year plan.

​

In addition to all this the ministry has a Ministers Manual

​

https://www.thebiblecollegeofwales.org/bible-assemblies

God’s Government and Order for the Church Document

​

https://www.thebiblecollegeofwales.org/god-s-government-order

Restoring the Heritage Document

​

https://www.thebiblecollegeofwales.org/restoring-the-heritage

 

Further to these documents are policies and procedures relating to the business of the Charity:

​

 

1. Complaints Policy

2. Conflict of Interest Policy

3. Managing Volunteers Policy

4. Safeguarding Policy

5. Equal Opportunities Policy

6. Expenses Policy

7. Health & Safety Policy

8. Information Security Policy

9. Protection of Child and Vulnerable Adults Policy

 

On 5th. July 2018 the trustees at Whithorn, Brian Mason, David & Lindsay Griffiths with copy to Marjorie Beynon in North Wales considered the previous year’s trustee meetings which were very profound and dealt with the ongoing threats to the ministry, threats on line with those endured by the Early Church.

​

Acts 4:29 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

29 And now, Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak thy word,

​

This meeting on the 7th. July 2018 considered the history of the ministry it being considered that alien philosophies had affected our nation’s legal system and that we had been victims of it. It was considered whether the extraordinary costs of the Charity Commission Enquiry, and taking away from former trustee Sheila Standish of her choice – whether now the period of cultural Marxism was over and whether justice could now be done.

​

The enthusiasm and passion of former trustee Clive Bate was also considered and how he had now walked out on us leaving us the bills of all of this. It was decided unanimously to continue with the Mission Houses projects despite with the increased costs of Whithorn and Barry to the ministry, the difficulties that would cause.

​

The security of the ministry was also considered, there having been concern intimated on a previous occasion by North Wales Police for our safety.

​

The insurances, procedures and policies previously agreed in the trustee meetings of 15-16 & 17-18 were also discussed and agreed to continue.

​

The previous year’s resolutions were also considered:

​

Resolutions:

1. That trustees understand that the ministry is following the pure line of Antioch facing up to opposition constantly from those of the Alexandrian line.

2. After the reading of Professor Noble’s piece in BCN – that the trustees wholeheartedly support Professor Noble in his exposure of an underlying system designed to undermine those of traditional values & that a letter be sent to him saying so. II Cor 4:4.

3. After the reading of Todd’s letter – trustees understand what we have been facing and that without BREXIT and TRUMP the oppression would have continued.

4. After the reading of the funding of charities for unconstitutional purposes by the EU and past British governments – that now post-BREXIT government owes us grants to restore its own Constitution (hence the course) – street stalls alongside Change Britain.

5. That trustees and our professional advisers understand that we have been warned by a senior CID officer of the nature of the high level attack against us.

6. That the ministry has been warned of the targeting going on by Paul Diamond, Barrister and that the first three months in prison are the worst!

7. That trustees inform creditors of all this.

8. That intercessions have taken place to bring the conditions for the truth to come out and recovery not only to us but to the remnant to take place.

9. That the Charity Commission has protected large charities giving high wages and pensions to its employees from publicly given funds, the public thinking the money was primarily for the cause stated – particularly in view of Daniel Hannan clear evidence of named charities benefitting by bowing down to a political ideal illegal under our Constitution – 1534 Act of Supremacy.

10. That the Charity Commission targeted us, a charity of sacrifice with illegal (under our Constitution) approaches of emphasizing procedure and policy above the meaning of the word charity which is agape. The charity took the witness of two known violent criminals in its investigation and did not give heed to the context of the situation, one of the senior investigators not declaring a conflict of interest, she being found out having RC charismatic links in Wales who had been opposing us. It be recognized that these actions cost the charity its resources to operate smoothly.

11. The fact Lindsay and I taken into a small room and threatened by an Islamic Barrister that if we say anything the system will take everything from us not consistent with British Constitutional Law and that this should be known.

12. That the BBC National Radio should want to do a programme on us based on ridiculous accusations be known. That the stress of this was massive and that miraculously we were helped legally without charge.

13. That the Home Office rejected a key worker’s application to work with us causing huge hours to be worked by remaining staff.

 

Trustees therefore noted this and whilst the primary reason for moving the H/Q to SW Scotland was to return The Bible College of Wales – Original Vision to the spiritual birthplace of the ministry, it was also noted the benefits to be away from a group targeting us in North Wales in line with the same attacks the Early Church had to endure.

​

Assessments from the previous year’s calculations were also considered, it now waiting till all the new trustees are on board to re-consider these:

​

Previously discussed procedures and risk assessments were discussed too, particularly in view of moving to a much larger building:

 

1)  Banking

 

Our banking is with Barclays Bank ......

 

RISK:  Improper Management of accounts by bank or bank going into insolvency

 

CONTROLS: Even though the Bank is regulated by FSA, high levels of corruption with banking circles have been identified within recent years.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M

 

2) RISK OF CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS OF INCOME

 

RISK: Business interruption

 

CONTROLS: Ensure business interruption cover is on our insurance policy

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING (if cover in place): L

 

3) Financial Controls and Records

 

RISK: Charity's finances at risk due to fraud

 

CONTROLS: Regulating through issue of regular financial reports, checking and approving invoices by more than one trustee, Chartered accountancy.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L

 

4)  Complying with Borrowing Restrictions

 

RISK: Risk of not being able to obtain funds or having to repay early particularly in view of Emerging Church takeovers.

 

CONTROLS: Trustees to regularly assess borrowing and ensure actions taken early to reduce risk. Challenge the legality of Emerging Church takeovers.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M - suggest agenda item to trustees to reduce to L.

 

5) Loss of Cash through theft or dishonesty

 

RISK: Loss to Charity

 

CONTROLS: Little cash held at Charity premises, fidelity insurance cover

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L -if fidelity insurance cover we have

 

6) Adequate Budget Management

 

RISK: of overspend particularly in view of lack of response to giving outside the circle of trustees and Council of Reference.

 

CONTROLS: Detailed budget approved annually at AGM with detailed reports regularly going to trustees for checking.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M - suggest agenda item to trustees to reduce to L.

 

7) Compliance with Tax Regulations

 

RISK: ignorance of rules

 

CONTROLS: Courses for trustees, regular checking by professional help.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M - suggest agenda item to trustees to reduce to L particularly in view of funds apparently owing to HMRC

 

8) Decision Making

 

RISK: Charity may face legal actions resulting in financial penalties

 

CONTROLS: A decision book be kept of everyday decisions to be checked by trustees

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: H - suggest agenda item to trustees to reduce to L particularly in view of large amount of government enquiries

 

9) Contracts

 

RISK: Risk of legal challenge due to non-compliance with terms of contract.

 

CONTROLS: Have a trustee read contracts and present report at meetings, seek legal advice.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L - if controls in place.

 

10) DOCUMENT CONTROL

 

RISK: Risk of losing portable hard drives, manual documents etc.

 

CONTROLS: Re-do current manual files for all Charity archiving old material; back up of computer documents.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L - if controls in place

 

11) PROPER RECORD KEEPING

 

RISK: Risk that documents would not stand up in a current court of Law

 

CONTROLS: All minutes to be numbered and approved and signed at next meeting. Signed minutes retained in secure storage with back up on computer with easy referencing.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M - normally L but NT Christianity is alien to modern day legal processes.

 

12) ABSENCE OF PROCEDURES SECRETARY/HI TECH OPERATOR

 

RISK: With understaffing in the Charity there is a risk of non-operation should specialist staff be unavailable for long periods.

 

CONTROLS: We need to get more staff and train them in the operations of the Charity. At present staff are doing more than one job and over stretched.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: H - this issue needs to be addressed.

 

13) COMPLAINTS HANDLING

 

RISK: Risk of action against the Charity, possibly resulting in drain of financial resources.

 

CONTROLS: That trustees bring together a COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE adopted in agreement with all trustees.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: H - with a designated group determined to destroy the charity through legal complaints - intercession, determination and conviction to overcome then down to L with the new complaints procedure.

 

14) ACCESS TO OFFICE FILES

 

RISK: Access of Charity information to hostile infiltration.

 

CONTROLS: Regular security procedures.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L - if controls in place

 

15) COMPLYING WITH EMPLOYMENT LAW

 

RISK: Possibility of tribunals and financial penalties

 

CONTROLS:  Proper advice sought, Disciplinary and Grievance procedures, job descriptions, staffing meetings.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L - if controls in place

 

16) COMPLYING WITH INLAND REVENUE REQUIREMENTS (Trading CO)

 

RISK: Possibility of tribunals and financial penalties

 

CONTROLS: Regular updates, advice received from IR, checks by Chartered Accountant

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M - if controls in place - Trading Company has had £100 fine due to late registration of figures even though figures in quickly.

 

17) Honesty/Integrity

 

RISK: Possibility that Charity may be brought into disrepute and undergoing of time consuming investigations by the Charity Commission.

 

CONTROLS: Code of conduct agreed, accurate accounting practices and monitoring of operations.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M - if controls in place - also strategy getting over the targeting of RC groups determined to destroy the charity through legalism.

 

18) Health and Safety of Staff & Visitors

 

RISK: Risk of accident, injury or loss.

 

CONTROLS: Employers Liability insurance to cover volunteers, health and safety risk assessments; fire safety assessment.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L - if controls in place

 

19) Lone Working

 

RISK: Additional risk to volunteers, hirers, contractors due to lone working.

 

CONTROLS: Safe access and exit points; restricted access re. acts of violence; safety of equipment; emergency channels of communication; site security; alarm systems and personal attack alarms; supervision checking.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: M - see ways to reduce to L

 

20) Public Events

 

RISK:

 

CONTROLS: Adequate planning of events undertaken and roles and responsibilities identified; insurance checked

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L

 

21) RISK TO THIRD PARTY

 

RISK: Risk of injury or other loss to third parties

 

CONTROLS: All assets regularly inspected - written records kept, action taken to repair any damage

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L

 

22) LIBEL AND SLANDER

 

RISK: Risk of proceedings taken against the Charity for libel or slander by volunteers

 

CONTROLS: Insurance cover; also particularly in broadcasting to ensure keeping of accurate facts to back up statements

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L

 

23) CONTRACTORS

 

RISK: Risk of claim due to work undertaken by contractor on Charity Premises

 

CONTROLS: Contractors to be vetted to see they have adequate public liability insurance (min £2,000,000) dependent on scale of work.

 

SUGGESTED RISK RATING: L

 

24)  PROTECTION OF PHYSICAL ASSETS

 

RISK: Possible cost of replacement, repairing or damage

 

CONTROLS: Buildings and contents insured and indexed linked; Inventory of contents held (big job - Quicken programme has this) Adequate security.

 

a) Perimeter Walls and Fences - to be checked regularly

 

b) Paths and Access areas - to be checked regularly

 

c) Lighting - Internal and external lighting to be checked

 

d) Window cleaning - competent window cleaner employed

 

e)  Gullies, drains, down pipes regularly checked

 

f)  Risks of slips and trips checked

 

g)  Storage - particularly careful re chemicals

 

h)  Accident Book

 

It was clear from the previous trustee meetings, the importance of not only carrying on, but carrying of with a greater determination to meet the goals of the seven year plan:

​

LCMI TRUSTEES CASE TO CARRY ON

 

1. Trustees believe it is not right to bow down to the tyranny within the establishment of the last thirty years that has targeted us and looked to destroy us and the calling God has given us, a calling that has cost David and Lindsay Griffiths all they have, the same being prepared now to go to paid employment and give all they have to a cause God gave by specific word to continue and not close.

 

Evidence for this statement

 

1. The Scriptures clearly inform us who the god of this world is and that he will endeavour to prevail against us. By exposing his activity however he is commanded to restore so this statement exposes completely the activity against us and it is the belief of trustees that the resources have to follow to fulfil the call.

 

2 Corinthians 4:4 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

4 in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

​

Matthew 16:18-19 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 

 

19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

​

Proverbs 6:31 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

31 but if he be found, he shall restore sevenfold;
he shall give all the substance of his house

 

That the trustees of this ministry do not trust the legal processes of the nation whilst under European control, contrary to the 1534 Act of Supremacy that specifically forbids such infiltration. The Trustees do however accept solely British Law based on the Elizabethan Settlement and the Coronation Oath of the Monarch – we being Constitution Keepers rather than rebels to the Monarch’s Oath.

 

The obligations of the 1534 Act is as follows:

​

1. Increase in virtue (anointing) of Christ’s Religion.

2. Repress and extirpate all errors, heresies, and other enormities and abuses.

3. The Monarch to act in the line of repressing the extremities that are religiously affecting the nation.

4. To conserve the peace, unity and tranquillity of the realm.

5. To repress the infiltration of foreign laws and systems into our nation.

 

The obligation of the Head of State according to her oath (1689 Act) is as follows:

 

1. Maintain the statutes, laws and customs of the realm.

2. Government of the People is the Monarch’s responsibility according to the statutes of Parliament and the laws and customs of the same.

3. Law and justice in mercy to be executed in all judgements.

4. The Laws of God maintained, the Monarch being obligated to do this by the utmost of her power meaning she is honour bound not to allow laws onto the statute book that contravene the Word of God, any such law being null and void according to this constitutional demand.

5. The utmost of the Monarch’s power has to be used in relation to the ongoing profession of the Gospel and the Protestant Reformed Religion that has been established by law.

6. Rights and privileges are given by law to Bishops and clergy meaning in reality that anyone who tries to quieten the ministry of the Gospel would be in effect guilty of High Treason.

 

This “case to carry on” clearly shows that over the last thirty years that the above principles have not been applied in our legal dealings with state bodies.

 

Professor Arthur Noble, British Church Newspaper, 09 December 2016 gives clear evidence of a conspiracy against ministries such as ours that is now coming out to the fore and that post-BREXIT this ministry will flourish. He states that there has been “an oligarchy of banksters and large corporations – a confederacy of evil” that has been hiding behind a “façade of cross-cooperating as the promoters of freedom, peace, human rights, the alleviation of world poverty and hunger, and the general betterment of mankind.

 

Professor Noble continues to say that the very aim however has been just the opposite spreading chaos by “first destroying the traditional concepts of humanity, religious beliefs, nationhood, family, gender and even civilization itself”, all in the aim of bringing about a one world government, in our view full of socialistic, controlling ideals that has been dominating government agencies including ones who have directly opposed us including Social Services, the Court of Protection and its lawyers, and the Charity Commission.

 

The uprisings that are going on around the World at this time tell us that this Order has been thwarted in that it is now out in the open despite of Hillary Clinton’s accusations of “fake news”!

 

Despite of all but being destroyed by a Charity Commission enquiry based on letter rather than spirit, an enquiry brought about by complaints into them by two known violent criminals and a person who herself had professed having been in witchcraft, we still have decided to carry on rejoicing in the fact that under the heading The Tyranny of the Status Quo Daniel Hannan MEP has exposed a tyranny that the Charity Commission has chosen to ignore, that some large charities have chosen to forsake their own and nation’s heritage and culture so as to bring about financial resource from Europe.

 

Substantially proving his case the MEP refers to the then Foreign Secretary David Miliband who made “a great song and dance” about the fact that it was not only Labour Europhiles who embraced the Lisbon Treaty but also a whole range of NGO’s. “The NSPCC has pledged its support, as have One World Action, Action Aid and Oxfam……. Environmental organisations support the treaty provisions on sustainable development and even the commission of bishops support the treaty. This is a coalition, not of ideology, but integrity.”

 

At a time when the morality and integrity of our ministry is being questioned by the embracers of policy and procedure, nothing is being said by the Charity Commission of the importance of sacrifice and love and the giving of one’s life for another. This has all gone the way of high salaries, pensions and correct legal procedure! This ministry is right in its refusal to bow down to such people.

 

“Integrity” continues Hannan. “A few moments on the Internet revealed that every organisation he had cited was in receipt of EU subventions. Most of them, it turned out, had also received grants from the British government.” It is clear that as with our case with the Charity Commission no conflict of interest was cited.

 

Yet in our case trustees had sacrificed to maintain the vision, founders had sacrificed all they had, an overwhelming spiritual sense of complete submission to the cause had at times gripped the ministry only for in one case a court to decide there was a lack of mental capacity.

 

Here however in this case deals were being drawn to sacrifice our nation to a foreign philosophy and cause, a philosophy that in case after case was designed to destroy us, a philosophy out of line with our nation’s Constitutional acts.

 

“Hardly surprising, then” declared Hannan, “that they should dutifully endorse a treaty supported by their paymasters. What was surprising was the extent of their financial dependency. When Mr Milliband sat down, I fired off a written question, asking the European Commission how much money it had paid these organisations. It turned out that, in the previous year , Action Aid, the NSPCC, One World Action and Oxfam had among them been given 43,051,542.95

 

Not surprising then for Hannan to ask the question: “can organisations in receipt of such colossal subsidies legitimately call themselves “non-governmental.” Can they claim to be independent? Can they even describe themselves a charities – at least in the sense that we commonly understand the word?”

 

We now come to the Commission of Bishops Mr Milliband had cited, the Commission in favour of the Lisbon Treaty taken Britain out of its Constitutionsal obligations to the Monarch’s Oath to God. Hannan discovered that the Commission referred to was the Commission of Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community. He discovered that this Commission was not a group of Bishops of British episcopal persuasion but “it was a Brussels based outfit whose purpose was to promote reflection, based on the (Roman Catholic) Church’s social teaching on the challenges facing a united Europe.” It is our view that it was this ideology coming against us through the Charity Commission and Conwy County Council Social Services in two separate cases that drained us of vital resources, resources not lacking with these Bishops, not lacking with treacherous charities but lacking with us because we’re keeping our laws whilst the others were embracing foreign law contrary to the 1534 Act of Supremacy. Now post-BREXIT justice needs to be done and we are going to see in Christ Jesus Name that it is done!